open search
close
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Employees have a right to annual leave or payment in lieu between illegal dismissal and reinstatement, ECJ rules

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The European Court of Justice has ruled that for the period between an unlawful dismissal and reinstatement as an employee, workers are entitled to annual paid leave or to payment at the end of the employment relationship in lieu of leave accrued and not taken.

Background

In these joined cases a Bulgarian school employee and an Italian bank employee were dismissed. These dismissals were subsequently held to be illegal and the employees were reinstated; subsequently both were legally dismissed. The cases concerned whether these employees had a right to, and should therefore be indemnified for, paid annual leave for the period between their illegal dismissal and reinstatement.

Findings of the Court

The European Court of Justice emphasised the particular importance of the right to paid holiday as a principle of EU law. It drew a parallel with the situation where a worker is unable to perform his or her duties due to sickness and is considered to have worked for the purposes of annual leave accrual. The Court considered this to be analogous with a period of absence from work as a result of an illegal dismissal. The fact that a worker has been deprived of the opportunity to work because of a dismissal that is subsequently found to be unlawful is unforeseeable and beyond the control of the worker. This means that the period between a worker’s unlawful dismissal and reinstatement in his or her employment must be treated in the same way as a period of actual work for the purposes of determining the entitlement to paid annual leave: that is, entitlement to leave accrues over this period.

Joined cases C‑762/18 and C‑37/19 Varhoven kasatsionen sad na Republika Bulgaria

Ius Laboris




Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Luxemburg Neueste Beiträge

Dismissal for a single (serious) act

Can an employer dismiss an employee for a single wrongful act? And if so, does this wrongful act make the employee liable for damages caused to the employer? The Luxembourg Court of Appeal answered these questions in a recent case. In this case, an employee caused an accident while moving a 15-tonne forklift tractor to retrieve his 3-tonne forklift. The employee had neither the training…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

A negative attitude at work: grounds for termination?

Can an employee’s poor attitude and communication style be a reason to terminate their employment? A court in the Netherlands has ruled it can. Culpable behaviour by employees is clear if there is evidence of theft, fraud or (sexual) harassment, for example. Professional underperformance also constitutes grounds for dismissal if there is sufficient documentation. But what if the employee substantively performs well, but his or…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Get vaccinated or risk dismissal: Latvia’s new rules for on-site work

Tough new workplace access rules in Latvia mean employers can suspend and even dismiss on-site employees considered at risk of COVID-19 exposure if they are not vaccinated. From 15 December the vaccination obligation will be extended to all on-site employees. Autumn in many European countries began with new and more stringent restrictions as legislators across the continent tried their best to limit the spread of…
Abonnieren Sie den kostenfreien KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

 

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert