open search
close
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge United States

Executive Order combatting discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community: what do US-employers need to know?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Within hours of his inauguration on 20 January 2021, President Biden signed his Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation. The Executive Order establishes the new administration’s policy prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation, and directs federal agencies to take affirmative steps to secure these rights.  

The Executive Order commits to enforcing the holding of Bostock v. Clayton County throughout all federal agencies. In Bostock, the Supreme Court of the United States held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination ‘because of . . . sex’ covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. After Bostock was decided, several federal agencies, including the United States Department of Education, in interpreting Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, sought to distinguish Title VII in an effort to avoid applying Bostock to certain controversial matters, such as sex-separated bathrooms, locker rooms and athletic teams. Under the prior administration, the Department of Education refused to recognise the applicability of Bostock to such situations.  

Notably, the Executive Order specifically addresses student access to restrooms, locker rooms, and sports, and confirms that the Bostock holding applies to Title IX to prohibit discrimination against transgender individuals in school settings. It also orders the Department of Education to officially reverse these policies impacting the rights of transgender and gender non-conforming students. The Executive Order also explicitly confirms the applicability of Bostock to any other federal law prohibiting sex discrimination, including the Fair Housing Act, s412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Affordable Care Act.  

Under this Executive Order, the head of each federal agency is directed to reevaluate their policies relating to sex discrimination, including the agency’s implementing regulations, in light of the Bostock decision, and make changes consistent with the instruction of the Executive Order within 100 days. The head of each agency must develop a plan to implement, revise or rescind its policies to conform to the statutes that prohibit sex discrimination consistent with the Biden administration’s policy set forth in the Executive Order. Bottom line

President Biden’s Executive Order represents a return to Obama-era policies aimed at including LGBTQ+ individuals in anti-discrimination protections. Although Bostock addressed Title VII, the Executive Order directs that holding to apply to all federal laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of ‘sex,’ including Title IX and its implementing regulations related to sex-separated bathrooms, locker rooms and athletic teams. This marks a change for states that have not already passed such laws, and presents an area of potential litigation in more than a dozen states where lawmakers have proposed, or previously passed, legislation restricting participation in athletics and/or gender-confirming health care for transgender minors.  

Employers, public schools, universities, colleges, health insurers, healthcare professionals and landlords, among others subject to federal law, should review their policies and procedures to ensure they are aligned with Bostock and the Executive Order, and take action to address any discrimination or harassment based on sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and/or transgender status. Employers subject to federal law should also ensure their policies are applied equitably to prevent discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community. 

We anticipate seeing more executive orders addressing equality issues relating to the LGBTQ+ community, including a repeal of the Trump administration’s bar on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military, which was announced by the White House on Monday 25 January. 

Ius Laboris




Ius Laboris is a leading international employment law practice combining the world’s leading employment, labour and pension firms. Our role lies in sharing insights and helping clients to navigate the world of labour and employment law successfully.
Verwandte Beiträge
Compliance Datenschutz Individualarbeitsrecht Kollektivarbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge Top-Management

Arbeitsrecht im Jahr 2024: Die Top 5

Rechtzeitig zu den Silvester-Vorbereitungen lesen Sie hier unseren Jahresrückblick auf eine kleine Auswahl an beachtenswerten und für das Arbeitsrecht relevanten Urteilen. Besonders bewegt haben uns im Jahr 2024: Schadensersatzforderungen nach DSGVO-Auskunftsverlangen, Zielvereinbarungs-Boni, Überstundenvergütungen von Teilzeitkräften, die Konzernleihe sowie entschädigungsfreie Wettbewerbsverbote. Top 1 – Auskunftsverlangen nach Art. 15 DSGVO – Schadensersatzrisiko entschärft Schadensersatzforderungen des Arbeitnehmers wegen eines angeblichen Datenschutzverstoßes des Arbeitgebers waren ein beliebtes Instrument, um…
Internationales Arbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Diversity and inclusion: what’s new and what’s coming up?

Promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace is a fast-moving area of law and HR practice. What’s new across the world? Harassment In the wake of the #MeToo movement, many jurisdictions implemented or improved harassment protections and that trend is still evident across the world. In Denmark the government and social partners have entered into a wide-ranging agreement on sexual harassment to foster change. Consisting…
Antidiskriminierung Individualarbeitsrecht Neueste Beiträge

Diskriminierung 4.0: Warum auch die Suche nach „Digital Natives“ heikel ist

Aus der Nutzung des Begriffs „Digital Native“ in einer Stellenanzeige kann unter Umständen auf eine unzulässige Benachteiligung wegen des Alters geschlossen werden. Dies hat das Arbeitsgericht Heilbronn entschieden (Urteil vom 18.1.2024, Az. 8 Ca 191/23). Denn Digital Native meine nach allgemeinem Sprachverständnis eine Person aus einer Generation, die mit digitalen Technologien bzw. in einer digitalen Welt aufgewachsen ist. Der 1972 geborene Kläger war nach Ansicht…
Abonnieren Sie den kostenfreien KLIEMT-Newsletter.
Jetzt anmelden und informiert bleiben.

 

Die Abmeldung ist jederzeit möglich.